Power Play in the Capital: Delhi’s Tug-of-War Over Administrative Control Intensifies

Introduction
Delhi’s political landscape is once again ablaze with tension as the Centre and the Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) spar over control of administrative services. The latest developments mark a turning point in the long-standing governance dispute, with legal withdrawals, public statements, and strategic maneuvers reshaping the capital’s power dynamics.

Key Developments

• The Rekha Gupta-led Delhi government has formally withdrawn seven cases filed by the previous AAP regime against the Centre and the Lieutenant Governor.
• These cases included challenges to the GNCTD Amendment Act, disputes over Yamuna River rejuvenation, and fund allocation for the Delhi Jal Board.
• The Supreme Court permitted the withdrawal, signaling a shift in Delhi’s legal strategy.
• AAP leaders criticized the move, calling it a betrayal of Delhi’s mandate and a surrender of federal autonomy.
• The Centre maintains that Delhi, as the national capital, must remain under its administrative purview.
• AAP argues that elected representatives should have authority over transfers and postings to uphold democratic governance.

Political Reactions

• AAP accused the BJP-led government of abandoning governance in favor of vendetta politics.
• Allegations surfaced over misuse of investigative agencies and delay in fulfilling electoral promises.
• The BJP defended its actions, citing the need for administrative coherence and national interest.
• Public Works decisions, including probes into infrastructure projects, have added fuel to the fire.

Public Sentiment

• Citizens express growing frustration over stalled development and lack of clarity in governance.
• Women’s groups demand fulfillment of pre-poll promises, including monthly honorariums.
• Environmental activists remain concerned about the Yamuna cleanup and vehicle bans.

Conclusion
As Delhi’s governance debate deepens, the clash between central authority and regional autonomy continues to shape the city’s future. With legal battles paused but political tensions rising, the capital watches closely—waiting for leadership that prioritizes progress over power struggles.