Row Erupts Over Memo on Ayyappa Deeksha on Duty
An internal circular issued by a police official, denying permission to a subordinate to observe certain practices of the Ayyappa Deeksha while on duty, has sparked widespread controversy. The memo, which became public recently, has ignited a debate about the balance between religious freedom and the strict uniform code required in disciplined forces like the police department.
The official directive was reportedly issued to a Sub-Inspector (SI) who had applied for permission to follow the traditional customs associated with the 41-day vow. These customs typically include wearing black or dark clothing instead of the prescribed uniform, not wearing footwear, and growing a beard, all of which are central to the spiritual practice before the pilgrimage to Sabarimala.
The memo, citing earlier departmental instructions, made it clear that exemptions to the prescribed uniform and code of conduct cannot be granted for religious purposes while an officer is performing their duty. It reportedly advised that any police personnel wishing to observe the ‘Deeksha’ or any similar religious austerity should apply for leave to do so. The core argument rests on the need to maintain uniformity, discipline, and operational effectiveness within the force, which is considered non-negotiable for a body entrusted with public security.
Religious and political groups, particularly those associated with Hindu sentiments, strongly objected to the circular. They argued that the memo was an infringement on the religious rights of the personnel and questioned why such strict restrictions were allegedly applied to Hindu officers while other communities might receive flexibility for their religious observances, such as fasting.
This controversy quickly moved from an internal police matter to a public issue, with protestors gathering at the police headquarters to demand the immediate withdrawal of the circular. They viewed the instruction as disrespectful to the spiritual sentiments of Lord Ayyappa’s devotees. The protestors called on the state government to establish clear protocols that would respect the faith of the personnel while still addressing the operational needs of the police force.
The police department, facing increasing public and political pressure, maintained that the existing conduct rules for uniformed services do not permit deviation from the prescribed dress code. They reiterated that the rule applies to all religious practices and is necessary to uphold the highest standards of a disciplined service. The debate has brought into sharp focus the complex legal and social challenge of balancing the individual’s constitutional right to practice religion with the requirements of a government job that mandates uniformity and public-facing discipline. The issue remains a significant talking point, highlighting the need for a balanced policy that addresses both faith and duty.
