National Language or Regional Pride? Naidu and Pawan Kalyan Spark Hindi Debate in Andhra Assembly

In a session that ignited fresh linguistic discussions across the Telugu states, Andhra Pradesh’s Chief Minister N. Chandrababu Naidu and Deputy CM Pawan Kalyan offered contrasting views on the status and significance of Hindi in India’s cultural framework.

During a tribute to former Prime Minister P.V. Narasimha Rao, CM Naidu hailed Rao’s fluency in multiple languages as a hallmark of India’s diversity. “Rao garu spoke over ten Indian and foreign languages fluently. That’s the strength of Indian intellect and diversity,” Naidu remarked, subtly implying that no single language should dominate the national narrative.

However, Deputy Chief Minister and Jana Sena Party leader Pawan Kalyan presented a different vision. He strongly endorsed Hindi as a unifying national language, asserting it fosters integration across states. “Hindi connects India. It should be respected, just like our mother tongue,” he said, stirring both applause and opposition.

The debate over Hindi as a national language versus promoting regional languages like Telugu, Tamil, and Bengali has long been a sensitive topic, especially in southern India. The latest exchange between two of the most influential political figures in Andhra Pradesh has once again brought the issue to the forefront.

While Pawan Kalyan’s remarks resonated with those advocating national unity, critics argued that linguistic imposition could endanger the rich fabric of India’s multilingual identity.

Linguists and civil society members have also weighed in, urging leaders to frame the discussion around language inclusivity, not hierarchy. Many netizens, particularly from Telangana and Tamil Nadu, voiced concern over the resurgence of the “Hindi imposition” narrative on social media platforms.