Doctors’ Protest Disrupts Health Services in AP

Healthcare services across Andhra Pradesh have come under severe strain as over 2,800 Primary Health Centre (PHC) doctors continue their statewide strike. The protest, now entering its second week, has led to the suspension of outpatient services and emergency care in several districts, triggering public concern and administrative urgency.

The doctors are demanding a guaranteed 20% in-service quota for postgraduate medical admissions, valid until 2030. They argue that the current government order, which offers only a temporary increase from 15% to 20% for this year, lacks long-term assurance and fails to address their core concerns.

In addition to quota security, the doctors are pressing for:

• Time-bound promotions with financial benefits.
• Allowances for those serving in tribal and remote regions.
• Written commitments from the government to avoid yearly agitation.

Despite multiple rounds of talks, the government has not provided written guarantees. Health officials have stated that a comprehensive policy review is underway, but the doctors insist on immediate clarity.

The protest has escalated with hunger strikes and rallies, including a major demonstration in Vijayawada. Support has poured in from allied health associations, including ASHA workers and medical unions, amplifying the movement’s visibility.

Patients in rural areas are facing the brunt of the disruption. With PHCs closed, many are forced to travel long distances to district hospitals, which are now overwhelmed. Pregnant women, elderly patients, and those with chronic conditions are particularly affected.

The Commissioner of Medical Health has appealed to the doctors to resume duties, citing the government’s willingness to address demands. However, the association remains firm, stating that verbal assurances are no longer sufficient.

This standoff reflects deeper systemic issues in public healthcare—where frontline workers seek recognition, stability, and fair treatment. The strike also raises questions about the sustainability of rural health infrastructure and the urgency of policy reform.

As the impasse continues, public sentiment is divided. While many sympathize with the doctors’ demands, others worry about the impact on vulnerable communities. Political observers suggest that the issue may influence upcoming local elections, especially in constituencies with large rural populations.

The government is expected to convene another round of discussions this week. Until then, health services remain disrupted, and the doctors’ protest stands as a symbol of professional unrest and policy inertia.